The Commoditization of DevOps

DevOps didn’t become “hard to hire.” It became easy to fake.

When everyone can paste the same tooling list into a résumé, “DevOps” turns into a commodity role: interchangeable, keyword-driven, and detached from the actual job: running systems without drama.

Here’s the fix, from both sides of the table.

The problem: buzzwords beat competence

Most résumés now read like this:

  • Kubernetes
  • Terraform
  • CI/CD
  • Observability
  • Zero Trust
  • “Cloud-native”

Cool. None of that tells me you can:

  • debug a real outage
  • design a rollout that won’t wake people up
  • manage risk under pressure
  • keep cost/latency/reliability in balance

Tools are not the job. Operations is the job.

Rule #1: Don’t hire for the noun; hire for the verb

Hiring for “Kubernetes” is hiring for a noun.

Hire for verbs:

  • migrated a service with zero downtime
  • reduced MTTR with better triage + telemetry
  • built guardrails that made the safe path the easy path
  • automated the boring stuff without creating a Rube Goldberg machine

If someone can’t explain what they changed, why they changed it, and what broke the first time… you’re not hiring DevOps. You’re hiring buzzwords.

If you’re a hiring manager: stop interviewing like it’s 2012

Keyword scans + trivia questions create commodity outcomes.

Use proof-of-work instead:

  • Work samples
    • “Here’s a broken deployment pipeline. Fix it.”
    • “Here’s a messy Terraform module. Make it safer and explain tradeoffs.”
  • Functional scenarios
    • “You’re on-call. Latency tripled. Where do you look first?”
    • “Security says ’lock it down.’ Product says ‘ship faster.’ What do you do?”
  • Hands-on interviews
    • Not leetcode. Real systems thinking.

What you’re actually testing

  • can they reason under uncertainty?
  • do they have operational judgment?
  • do they communicate clearly when things are failing?
  • do they understand blast radius?

Interview for how they think when it’s 2AM.

If you’re an aspiring DevOps engineer: stop collecting tools like Pokémon

Yes, learn Kubernetes/Terraform/CI.

But the differentiator is operational fundamentals:

  • Linux + networking (real troubleshooting, not memes)
  • failure modes (timeouts, backpressure, saturation, retries)
  • incident response (triage, comms, postmortems)
  • delivery mechanics (progressive rollouts, canaries, feature flags)
  • security as constraints + guardrails, not “add a scanner and pray”

Practical ways to get real signal

  • Build a small system and operate it like it matters.
    • deploy it
    • break it
    • monitor it
    • recover it
    • write the postmortem
  • Contribute to open source with operational work (docs, CI fixes, release hygiene).
  • Keep a short “systems war stories” doc (even if your stories are from labs).

Your résumé should tell me you’ve shipped and operated things: not that you’ve heard of things.

The industry part: we’re not growing operators fast enough

If we want fewer fake “DevOps” profiles, we need better pipelines:

  • training that includes hands-on operations, not just tool demos
  • internships/apprenticeships where someone teaches judgment
  • communities that share failure lessons, not just success screenshots

The core point

DevOps should not be a commodity role.

It matters because it sits at the intersection of:

  • delivery speed
  • reliability
  • security
  • cost

And the job is to keep those forces from tearing your system (and your team) apart.

Quotable rules

  • DevOps isn’t a checklist. It’s operational competence.
  • Hire for verbs, not nouns.
  • If you can’t explain tradeoffs, you don’t own the work.
  • Good DevOps reduces drama. Great DevOps reduces blast radius.

FAQ

Q: How do I spot authentic DevOps talent in interviews?

A: Ask candidates to walk through real incidents they’ve handled—what broke, how they diagnosed it, what they tried, and what they learned. Authentic DevOps engineers can tell war stories with specifics: error messages, metrics they checked, commands they ran. Look for operational judgment, not tool trivia.

Q: What red flags indicate someone is faking DevOps experience?

A: Vague answers about “managing Kubernetes clusters” without specifics on scaling challenges, incident response, or cost optimization. Inability to explain tradeoffs. Overemphasis on certification names rather than practical outcomes. No mention of on-call experience, postmortems, or production debugging.

Q: Should I hire for culture fit or technical skills in DevOps roles?

A: Both, but operational mindset trumps specific tool knowledge. A candidate with strong troubleshooting instincts and communication skills can learn Terraform. Someone who knows Terraform but can’t debug under pressure will struggle. DevOps requires collaboration, incident communication, and calm decision-making—hire for these intangibles alongside technical fundamentals.